Otázka ohledně webových stránek s hazardními hrami s licencí Curaçao, které používají nesprávný kód kategorie obchodníka (strana 849)

Let me try to sum up my response in one post. If you don’t mind, I’ll take a broader view, because these are important points and our approach may go slightly against the grain of how information about online casinos is typically regulated based on licensing alone.

Casino Guru is not a gambling operator. We don’t run any casinos and we don’t control which players a site chooses to accept. What we do is offer as much factual and up-to-date information as possible, including licensing details, player complaints and warnings about unfair practices.

The truth is that many players who are self-excluded via GamStop still actively look for ways to gamble and often end up registering at offshore or crypto casinos. This is already happening, often without any proper information or context, and we see the consequences almost daily in our forum and complaint system. Players report issues with casinos that have a Safety Index below 2, casinos that apply predatory rules or simply stop responding. That’s not theory. It’s the everyday reality we’re trying to improve.

Our content adapts to each visitor’s location. Players from the UK can clearly see which casinos are licensed by the UKGC and which are not. That way, if someone still chooses to register with an unlicensed operator, it’s not because a review site tricked or encouraged them. It’s a conscious decision made with full awareness of the risks.

We don’t claim this is a perfect approach. But in our experience, pretending these casinos don’t exist only increases the risk for vulnerable players. When visibility is removed, so are the warnings, and that helps no one.

That’s all I can add from my side. I understand that some may see things differently and that’s absolutely fine. I’m not here to convince anyone, just to clarify how we work and why.

"Lost fairly" means that when a player decides to play in a casino (local, offshore, licensed, unlicensed), it's their decision. They deposit the funds, play games, have fun, but eventually lose, then it's unfair to claim the deposits back and it's dangerous misrepresenting the truth to a bank or provider.

When you play in an offshore casino, deposit numerous times, but then the casino refuses to process the withdrawal, that's unfair and we wouldn't blame anyone for attempting to get the deposits back. If you're a casino that accepts players from various countries, you need to be ready to pay them out.

We know there are players who purposely look for casinos that aren't licensed in their country, but they accept players from the country. When they win, they get paid. When they lose, they attempt to get the deposits back through chargebacks. They want to play a no-risk game. My post is about informing the community members about potential risks that might be unclear for some users, but the risks are there. When you go through the conversation here or on other websites, you'll see players who've been sued by their own bank. I don't think it's worth it.

However you are affiliated?

is that correct? You make from affiliation?