FruityCasa Casino recenze

Hráči ze Spojených států amerických nejsou akceptováni
6.9 Rating
Dobrá
Reputace
Hráči ze Spojených států amerických nejsou akceptováni
Dobrá
Reputace
This review was last updated: 2018-06-20T00:00Z  

Recenzi kasina FruityCasa Casino jsme vykonali na základě oprávněných stížností hráčů a jiných faktorů jako platební metody, bonusy a nabízené hry. FruityCasa Casino patří k nadprůměrným internetovým kasinům, které se ale má stále v čem zlepšovat. Vložené finanční prostředky by měli být v bezpečí, ačkoliv jsme našli několik problémů při kontrole osobních údajů před realizací výběru z důvodu porušení obchodních podmínek. Přečtěte si celou recenzi a podrobnosti těchto stížností ohledně procesu výběru nebo FruityCasa Casino bonusů.

Rezidenti
ze Spojených států amerických
Not accepted
IP adresa
ze Spojených států amerických
Not blocked
Použití
VPN
Zakázáno
Jazyk
webu
anglicky (+4)
Live Chat
Language
anglicky (+4)
Email Support
Language
anglicky (+4)
Bonus bez vkladu
Nedostupný
Vstupní bonus
Nedostupný
Platební metody
Zobrazit všechny (17)
Výrobci her
Zobrazit všechny (42)
Vlastník
Caddell Limited N.V.
Založeno
2014
Limit výběru
40 000 €  mesíčně
Licenční orgány
Malta
Perfektní
Spojené království
Perfektní
Pro
  • Stránka The POGG ručí za vklady
  • Live chat podpora je k dispozici 24/7
  • Live chat podpora je vždy nápomocná a je k dispozici nonstop
Proti
  • Vkladatelé přes Skrill a Neteller nemají nárok na uvítací bonus
  • Pomalé zpracování výběrů (čekací doba 48 hodin)
  • Měna je přiřazena k účtu automaticky dle státu hráče
  • Delší zpracování výběrů - obvykle 3 dny a více

Complaints about FruityCasa Casino and related casinos (13)

We have conducted extensive research on the we and as a result we have found following 13 complaints on FruityCasa Casino or any brands that might be interconnected with it. Taking into account seriousness and credibility of these complaints and estimated size of casino revenues we decided to give FruityCasa Casino a Dobrá reputation.

Dobrá reputace kasina
Complaints on related Spin Rider Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Černé body: 100
Player asked for a withdrawal, then casino accused him of having breached terms and conditions, all funds seized, deposit returned.
Player is complaining that after he won some money thanks to a bonus, he asked for withdrawal which was approved but never paid. He says casino sent him an email accusing him of breaching terms and conditions and therefore confiscated all his winnings. Only the deposit amount was returned. Player confirms he kept checking the rules and status of his funds along the game and denies any rules breaching. No reaction from the casino, no more update from the player.
 
This complaint is from 3/2018
Disputed amount: £1 200 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Delayed payment, likely paid
Černé body: 100
Player cannot get his winnings, Norwegian banks issue.
Player is complaining about long withdrawal processing. In the end, casino replies that it is a common issue for Norwegian players and that it is an issue of the Norwegian bank system. No more update since, the player has probably been paid.
 
This complaint is from 3/2018
Disputed amount: 30 000 kr (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Hello Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Generous casino
Černé body: -332
The casino showed generosity,
The customer wanted to withdraw their winnings but was declined by the casino, the deposit was returned and winnings confiscated based on their Bonus terms. Casino proved that they were in the right and the customer misread their Bonus terms. Nevertheless, the casino paid out all the winnings to the customer as a sign of good will.
 
This complaint is from 4/2017
Disputed amount: 28 000 kr (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Casimba Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Černé body: 100
Player's winnings were confiscated, accusation of breaching terms and conditions.
Player complained he used the first 3 deposit bonuses, played and won some money, but all his winnings were confiscated. At the same time, he admitted he hadn't deposited the minimum amount required in order to claim the bonus but still got the bonus. He complained the casino system allowed him to play with the bonus even though he didn' fulfill the conditions. In addition, he used a forbidden payment method for depositing. Casino replied to him and apparently was in contact with the player via phone. Only some of the deposit amount was returned. Uncertain case, no more update since.
 
This complaint is from 11/2017
Disputed amount: 1 354 $ (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Miami Dice Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Insufficient evidence from casino
Černé body: 771
A player adhering to all of the bonus conditions won and requested to withdraw. Casino made the final decision to refuse to pay out his winnings.
The player outlining the situation appealed to the casino that they would have paid him all his winningsю. The casino offered the player to contact the alternative dispute resolution provider. After that, the player explained that he won following all the rules. To which the casino replied, " We are investigating your case. We will contact You shortly" In this case player needs to contact the United Kingdom Gambling Commision to solve his complaint. Luckily for him, UKGK has a very good reputation and he has a good chance of his complaint being solved.
 
This complaint is from 12/2017
Disputed amount: £4 041 (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
No reaction, good regulator
Černé body: 250
The player complained about the non-payment of money. Casino Miami Dice even didn’t respond to player's complaint.
The player, adhering to all the conditions, won a certain amount and according to the rules of the first withdrawal brought only a specific amount. However, after waiting, he noticed that the casino confiscated the entire amount from his account. In this case, the player needs to contact the Malta Gaming Authority to solve his complaint.
 
This complaint is from 10/2017
Disputed amount: 15 000 $ (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Spinland Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Insufficient evidence from casino
Černé body: 22612
The customer couldn't withdraw all winnings nor self-exclude.
The customer wanted to withdraw their large winnings but the casino imposed a withdrawal limit on them. Not wanting to lose their money by staking it, the customer requested to time-out his account but had been declined, after which they set limits on their spending which, according to the customer, didn't work and they lost a considerable amount of money in the casino. The customer then accused the casino of breaking the rules of responsible gambling and requested a refund of his losses. The casino responded to this trying to dispute customer's claims but didn't provide sufficient evidence, thus the complaint is ruled in favor of the customer and escalated to the regulatory body.
 
This complaint is from 6/2018
Disputed amount: 370 000 kr (skutečné peníze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Uncertain case, good regulator
Černé body: 250
Casino imposed hidden withdrawal limit.
After withdrawing their winnings twice already, the customer wanted to make another withdrawal for a larger sum of money but the casino told him he'd exceed the withdrawal limit. The customer claimed there were no such limits in Terms and Conditions of the website. After a discourse, the casino doesn't seem to be responding anymore and we don't know if there was any further communication regarding this complaint.
 
This complaint is from 1/2018
Disputed amount: 100 000 kr (skutečné peníze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related The Grand Ivy Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Insufficient evidence from casino
Černé body: 1500
The player complains about the too long process of getting the win. In the end, the player did not get his win.
The player made a request to withdraw money from his account and this process took a very long time. The casino replied that it would try to solve this problem. Instead, however, the casino has not paid the winnings to the player and AskGamblers closed this complaint as an unresolved because the casino did not provide sufficient evidence of the guilt of the player.
 
This complaint is from 11/2017
Disputed amount: 3 000 $ (skutečné peníze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Insufficient evidence from casino
Černé body: 649
Player's entire balance was confiscated and deposit was returned. The casino didn't provide sufficient evidence.
After the player submitted a complaint, the casino decided to react and provide evidence of a player using more bet than a maximum allowed while playing with bonus money. After careful examination of all casino evidence, we decided that it doesn’t prove that player broke T&Cs.
 
This complaint is from 8/2017
Disputed amount: 35 000 kr (bonus money)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Gday Casino (Stejný vlastník)
Uncertain case, good regulator
Černé body: 250
Winnings confiscated, unclear case.
Player complained the casino had confiscated all his winnings after he requested a withdrawal. The player was accused of breaching terms and conditions. Unclear case, no proofs from player or casino. Player has submitted a PAB. No more update since.
 
This complaint is from 9/2017
Disputed amount: £9 000 (bonus money)
Read more on: casinomeister.com
Čtěte více
Complaints on related Spin Station Casino (Stejný vlastník)
No reaction, good regulator
Černé body: 250
The customer can't get verified.
The customer had submitted their verification documents, which according to the casino's terms and customer support shouldn't take longer than 48 hours but the customer had been waiting over 96 without a verification. The casino hadn't responded to this complaint.
 
This complaint is from 8/2017
Disputed amount: ?? (skutečné peníze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více
Uncertain case, good regulator
Černé body: 100
Winnings not paid out.
The customer made a withdrawal and the casino confirmed that it had been paid out but the customer didn't receive any money in their bank account. The casino insists that everything had been fine on their side and the money was sent to the customer's account but the customer claims they still didn't receive anything. There have been no further updates on this complaint.
 
This complaint is from 5/2018
Disputed amount: £200 (skutečné peníze)
Read more on: askgamblers.com
Čtěte více

Have you found a relevant complaint about this casino, or do you have personal bad experience? Help others and submit your complaint.

Odeslat stížnost
* Uvádíme jen stížnosti, při kterých došlo k porušení našeho kodexu férového gamblingu.

FruityCasa Casino bonus


3,45 z 5

při 1. vkladu

  • Minimální výše vkladu: 20 €
  • Podmínky protočení: 35x bonus + depozit
  • Maximální výše sázky: 5 €
  • Tento bonus by jste měli získat téměr OKAMŽITĚ

FruityCasa Casino platební metody

FruityCasa Casino hry

Automaty
Ruleta
Video poker
Bingo
Blackjack
Baccarat
Craps
Keno
Stírací losy

FruityCasa Casino výrobci her